Ghostly Passengers At Thailand Airport Video Breakdown


Parabreakdown takes a look at a recently surfaced video of what some are claiming shows a group of ghostly passengers exiting a plane that doesn't exist.

Comments

  1. Fifteen teens treated for rabies after GANG RAPING a donkey - Hmmm,you've been absent for several days now Joe - did the vaccine hurt as badly as a mental whipping from Stuey ?

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4247444/fifteen-teens-treated-for-rabies-after-gang-rape-of-donkey-as-cops-urge-anybody-else-who-admired-the-beast-to-turn-themselves-in-to-avoid-disease-spreading/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stueys the girl, i ktomis the boy. They make such a quit couple.

      Too bad they don't take their act and need for attention somewhere else

      Delete
    2. I find it Wierd as to 1 troll destroyed 17 Superfriends??
      It calls into question of the IQ of the Superfriends, or one should say LACK THERE OF!!!!
      Haa Haa Haa! lol!

      AC Collins.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousFriday, December 30, 2016 at 2:32:00 PM PST
      I've systematically destroyed the disbarred lawyer Brookreson, Big John, Leon, and countless other bigfoot bird brains who were so humiliated that they abandoned the blog. You (and your various sock puppets) are the only ones left who are willing to continue to sustain repeated daily beat downs. So congratulations on that!
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/bigfoot-hunter-trailcam-results.html

      You're so drunk, you can't remember you're own ramblings. I've never seen you humiliate anyone, Stue, only harass them until they're pretty much too creeped out to publish comments anymore. And you'd only ever truly upset someone around here if you debunked something to do with "Bigfoot".

      Oh and 2:58? Nobody whines when you want a turn at giving Stuart a B-Slap, let someone else partake in their turn.

      Delete
    4. Didn't you proclaim that you'd be gone for a week? Wow. Just wow.

      Delete
    5. Oh Stue... You've got me so upset that I don't know what else to do other than devote my time to you.

      How many times have you reported yourself to blogger in the last 24 hours?

      Delete
    6. IktomiTuesday, August 15, 2017 at 9:32:00 AM PDT
      Rock on Stue... I'll pop back in a week from now.

      Delete
    7. Iktomi: "I've systematically destroyed the disbarred lawyer Brookreson, Big John, Leon, and countless other bigfoot bird brains who were so humiliated that they abandoned the blog"

      All ive ever seen was ikdummy defend bigfooters. Now he says he destroys them?
      Wasn't brookreson the guy that owned land in Texas that said he had bigfoot on his property? Ikdummy was his friend and defended him.

      ikdummy is losing his mind. He gives people beatdowns?? All ive ever seen is people make fun of him.

      Delete
    8. He does appear to be going off the rails. I'm actually starting to become worried about him!

      Delete
    9. Stuey, I know that putting chips in a sandwich is about as creative as you get, but surely you've got better in that trolling arsenal of yours that simply that?

      So what is it Stue? Have you single handedly gotten rid of all those people in your pasted comment up top, or is it down to your "army of trolls"??

      Delete
    10. You are nuttier than a squirrel turd, ikdummy.

      Delete
    11. So it was Iktomi who beat down Brookreson and Leon and caused them to leave? I guess that does make a certain amount of sense.

      Delete
    12. Ikdummy sees the blog as ruined and now wants credit.

      Delete
    13. I'll take that as an admission on your part, of a sheer inability to sustain a coherent stand on your trolling. Just like the Skinwalker Ranch Plantpeople you claim are running around the US... And then the "Bigfoot don't exist" stands you switch between.

      What a loon.

      Delete
    14. I'm relatively new here. What was Iktomi's beef with Brookerson, Big John, and Leon? He seems to be on here to pick fights with everyone.

      Delete
    15. Those other people came here to discuss the subject matter (bigfoot), but Iktomi is more interested in creating drama and having stupid pissing matches about trolls, etc . . .

      Delete
    16. Gimme a challenge then Stue! Where are all your heros gone?

      : )

      Delete
    17. So Brookereson big john and leon were my heroes and you drove them away?

      Who are my heroes?

      I have no idea what you are talking about.

      Delete
    18. He assumes that everyone else is as obsessed with this blog as he is and knows the obscure details of every strange character who has passed through here in the past five years.

      Delete
    19. http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/05/the-plural-of-hero-is-heroes-not-heros/

      Delete
    20. ikdummy tried to correct me on correctly using "heroes" as the plural of "hero".

      Delete
    21. Someone must have really hammered Iktomi on his poor writing skills -- I notice that he reflexively corrects his own mistakes as if anyone here even cares that he's essentially illiterate!

      Delete
    22. Looks like Stuey is out of ideas. Are you lonely by any chance?

      Delete
    23. Um no creep, are you trying to flirt with me???

      Delete
    24. It's got so bad for you, that you're now trying to correct my typos as grammar mistakes after I've correct them myself. I guess getting you to prove "Bigfoot don't exist" is out of the question?

      Delete
    25. Yep, you're lonely. Depressed, bored, angry and lonely.

      Delete
    26. ^ 9:05 joe projecting

      You weren't correcting your mistake, you didn't know at that point you had made a mistake, you were trying to correct the guy who posted heroes, then he posted a link straightening you out.

      Delete
    27. You have gone off the rails again joe.

      Seriously take just a few hours off. Go outside for a few minutes. Get some air.

      You can come fight your demons here again. But your obsession with this place is unhealthy. It is obvious this place causes you very real stress in your real life. It is unnecessary and unhealthy.

      Delete
    28. Demons? Stress? (Oh dear) Stuey... Ask yourself where are all the "sceptics"? Why don't you even attempt the subject anymore?

      That's right boio.

      Bored is more accurate.

      Delete
    29. Boring is most accurate, ikdummy.

      HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    30. AnonymousWednesday, August 16, 2017 at 9:03:00 AM PDT
      Get it yet joe/iktomi??? I will kill this place.


      Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you're laughing at that desktop, Stue?

      Delete
    31. Joe posts comments as anon that he later claims are other people's comments.

      You destroyed this blog, Joe F1tzgerald. Wales(shame) on you.

      Delete
    32. ... And there wouldn't be a single person on the planet that believes that, Stuey. Go back to school and learn how to use capitals properly.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    33. Now git, ikstinky!

      HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    34. Hey Stuey... It's just you and me pal. And I've got aaaaaaaal night for you.

      : )

      Delete
    35. Great buddy! Ok, what's your favorite movie?

      Delete
    36. This Iktomi guy is a real crackpot.

      Delete
    37. Capitalisation Reference List

      • Brand names.
      • Companies.
      • Days of the week and months of the year.
      • Governmental matters.
      • Historical episodes and eras.
      • Holidays.
      • Institutions.
      • Manmade territories.
      • Natural and manmade landmarks.
      • Nicknames and epithets.
      • Organisations.
      • Planets.
      • Races, nationalities, and tribes.
      • Religions and names of deities.
      • Special occasions.

      Delete
    38. •Toilet products like •iktomi are often uncapitalized.

      Delete
    39. Oh dear... Your capacity to learn isn't getting any better, eh?

      Delete
  2. Skinwalker Ranch Plantpeople?

    Never heard this before.

    Is ikdummy on drugs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AC collinsThursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:18:00 AM PST

      hey iktomi was up bro , check this out ,sceret life of plants, this phd,had a philadendren that was imprinted to him ,,every time he made love to his girlfriend the philadendren would have WILD ELECTRICAL SPIKES(the phd had electrical sensers attached to said plant) fully documented in book. Anyways he lives in LA,so this phd takes a weekend trip to san fransisco...in frisco hes making love to his girlfriend.
      At,say 1:00,,at the EXACT SAME TIME IN LA HIS PLANT(philadendren)was going Crazy,As if he was in his bedroom next door.now if sasquatch truly are the BOSS OF THE WOODS .maybe they can pick up on what the trees are communacating..just like what a imprinted phadendren can know when its friend(the phd) is having sex with his girlfriend...yea yea i just drank a fith of cheap vodka so im sorry if my thoughts dont come across as lucid as I would hope..
      Whatever THINK ABOUT I JUST SAID! Oh and that aint the 1/2
      Of it!!!

      ACcollins

      AC collinsThursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:24:00 AM PST

      TREES DONT LIKE TRAIL CAMS ATTACHED TO THEM ,AND SASQUATCH KNOW WHAT THE TREES ARE TALKIN ABOUT,,,,
      CARLOS CASTENADA 101???????

      AC collins

      Delete
    2. Your premise, ikdummy, your premise.

      More than one person, as hard as that is to accept. And it reads like he is joking.

      You are a nut, ikdummy.

      Delete
    3. And don't get me started on the airforce base.

      Delete
    4. premise, ikdummy. No one knows what ur talking about.

      Delete
    5. Did you learn a new word? It's a crying shame you can't apply it to anything coherent. Where would you be if I hadn't taught you half of your vocabulary?

      Delete
    6. You're my heros, ikdummy.

      Delete
    7. Shouldn't you be using capitals when you're using someone's name?

      Oops.

      Delete
    8. Ha ha ha ha ha ha anal anus Meldrum anus PhD anal anal schooled Stu anal anus ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha anal anal

      Delete
    9. Not your name, ikdummy. It's called disrespect.

      LOL

      Delete
    10. You're running out of ideas Stue!

      Try & proof read your comments before pointing out other people's typos, ya twit.

      Delete
    11. Stuzy-q the smelly site troll.

      Delete
    12. "ikdummy" is always uncapitalized out of disrespect for ikdummy.


      (CREASE) sigh

      Delete
    13. No, you're just too stupid to know that you address people with capitals in their names.

      What a patoot.

      Delete
    14. BS, ikdummy, I'm still your heros.

      Delete
    15. What is it with pseudosceptics and their shoddy use of capitals?

      Delete
    16. IktomiThursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:15:00 AM PDT
      
You're so drunk, you can't remember you're own ramblings.

      "You're" own ramblings? Really???

      Delete
    17. Stue... It aaaaaaall falls flat when you don't know how to use capitals for the first letters of names.

      Give it up, you look like an idiot.

      Delete
    18. "You're" logic is inescapable ikdummy! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    19. You've gone from "ALL CAPS" to butchering caps... Wow, just wow.

      Delete
    20. IktomiTuesday, April 26, 2016 at 12:11:00 PM PDT
      What's not odd, but is in fact typical... Is how someone who runs out of angles resorts to pointing out typos.

      Delete
    21. ... I'll add that what's hilarious... Is when that someone doesn't have the grammar to be that picky in the first place.

      : )

      Delete
    22. anal anal "grammur" anus anal

      Delete
    23. ikstinky, you have to earn capitals, son!

      Nowm sippy cup yo as$ out of our blog, ya hear?

      Delete
    24. Capital Letters: For Proper Nouns

      Proper nouns name something specific, for example, Jane, John, Oxford University, Denver, Qantas, Microsoft, Everest, Sahara.

      Delete
    25. 10:42, Joerg will make whatever argument suits him at the time. He cries when someone points out his horrible writing skills and whines that they have to resort to "typo hunting." But then Joerg is the first to mention others' typos as if he is making some wonderfully relevant argument!

      The point is that there is no core to Joerg. He doesn't even care about bigfoot -- it's just a vehicle by which he can attempt to inflate his insecure ego. He'll gladly argue both sides of an issue if he thinks it will make him look "intelligent."

      Delete
    26. Sorry, ikdummy, your're're unspecific.

      Delete
    27. Hey Stuey... Let's talk about "Bigfoot" pal! I'm more than happy to open old wounds!

      Do not use a capital letter for a common noun (i.e., the word for something) unless it starts a sentence. For example:
      • city
      • cat
      • ocean
      • uncle
      • tower

      Do use a capital letter for a proper noun (i.e., the specific name of something). For example:
      • New York
      • Pacific Ocean
      • Uncle George
      • Sears Tower
      • Stuey

      Delete
    28. Sorry, ikdummy, you're just not that specific.

      Delete
    29. Is it helping yet Stue? I know you're a slow learner and all...

      Delete
    30. This Iktomi guy seems kinda creepy.

      Delete
    31. Again... Projected from a list of truths published at you over the past few hours.

      Delete
    32. ikdummy is a creep who is not specific enough to necessitate a capital letter.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

      LOLZ to you! Cringe crease ik dum morph meld derm ichno arboreaensisicusthal

      Delete
    33. The day I rubbed Meldrum's paper in Stuey's face = the meltdown went up a notch.

      Delete
    34. Anal anus the day I rubbed Meldrum's crotch anal anal anus

      Delete
    35. Thats stuff u care about ikky. meldrum papers are meaningless.... 0 gravitas, 0 persuasion, 0 consequence.

      Delete
    36. You're very welcome to try and debunk it then... But last time I checked, it was a great source of anguish for you.

      http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/capitalletters.pdf

      Delete
    37. Do u understand 'not caring', ikdummy? It doesn't rise to the level of wasting time on. I give YOU more attention, ikdummy, than meldrum's tripe, but that's only for ridicule.

      Delete
    38. I've got a couple of comment sections bookmarked where you most certainly cared, only to look stupid again.

      Wanna read?

      : p

      Delete
    39. And I think you meant to write "you". And Meldrum needed a capital. If that isn't proof positive that you're stupid, I don't know what is.

      Delete
    40. Let me guess, Meldrum doesn't earn the respect either? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    41. I bet you do have this site bookmarked, ikkydumb. It's your life, after all.

      meldrum is inconsequential. bigfoot will never be declared a species. No bigfoot body will ever be found.


      Delete
    42. In all your grammatical superiority, I'm sure you meant to write...

      "Meldrum is inconsequential. Bigfoot will never be declared a species."

      ... And whilst there is nobody actively looking for that species with adequate resources to do so, then you'll have the consistent scientific evidence of a hominin that has the exact same widely reported anatomy of Sasq'ets, to worry yourself about. Your stance is a rhetorical safety net, and is fundamentally flawed as it's based on a sheer lack of interest from mainstream science, which does not even begin to address evidence that a list PhD's are happy to endorse.

      You are not only too stupid to challenge this evidence... But too stupid to realise that a reluctance from lesser mainstream scientists to want to test the evidence, has no bearing on the actual credibility of it.

      Delete
    43. Frankly your ideas sound like a bunch of nonsense to me, and not really worth responding to.

      Delete
    44. ... And then 19 comments, "responding to my nonsense", did of course follow.

      Delete
    45. Stuey getting crushed by Iktomi again.  Nothing new there.

      Delete
    46. I agree with Andy White, ikdummy. You can blab on but bigfoot will never be declared a species and no bigfoot body will ever be found. Everything else is a drunk welsh dandy flapping his foppish labia.

      Delete
    47. Did that happen before or after Andy had to explain to you what the "Neolithic Era" was?

      Delete
    48. You just repeated yourself Stuey. When you're attempting adult level debate, you need to address the argument that preceded yours, & then try and devise a logical, coherent counter argument.

      Delete
    49. Stuey... I've got a couple of comment sections where I evidence that I know what the Neolithic Era was, I think one source was a threat of comments where you tried arguing that HOMO Neanderthalensis wasn't a type of human.

      (Creased)

      You must be confused dear boy.

      Delete
    50. bigfoot will never be declared a species. No bigfoot body will ever be found.

      ikdummy, we can debate that the moon is made of cheese or i can just say that it's not. You can provide a lot of data on moon cheese for me to waste time sifting through but i'm not biting.

      Capisci?

      Delete
    51. IktomiMonday, August 15, 2016 at 8:56:00 AM PDT

      By modern Native American, I mean anything post Neolithic era.

      Andy WhiteMonday, August 15, 2016 at 9:13:00 



      "Neolithic" is not a term that is commonly used in North American archaeology. Do you have a date in mind before which a Native American is not "modern"?

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2016/08/radio-host-shares-his-bigfoot-encounter.html?m=1

      Delete
    52. Andy WhiteMonday, August 15, 2016 at 10:28:00 AM PDT

      "Neolithic" is a term for a technological period used in the Old World, usually associated with farming. The "Neolithic" doesn't start in the New World at 10,000 BC. In some places such as in parts of the Great Basin), human societies remained hunter-gatherers until European contact.

      Delete
    53. So who is confused "dear boy"?

      Delete
    54. Not commonly used, no, however there are Neolithic type tools found on the American continent, and Native Americans have lived on the American continent for the past 14,000 years. It is also generally accepted by mainstream academics that archaic skull morphology didn't transcend past the Neolithic Era.

      To state that "Bigfoot" will never be found whilst there is physical evidence for it, and still no consorted effort to investigate that evidence, is as useful as bringing up moons made of cheese as a comparison to an established ichnotaxon; one exists, the other doesn't. The data exists, if you're too stupid to address it, then that's ok.

      I did have to explain to you the meaning of an ichnotaxon after all.

      Delete
    55. You still don't know what the Neolithic Era was after it was explicitly defined for you!

      Delete
    56. Nargh! I just applied the Neolithic Era to America, something innumerable sources on the internet do. People lived on the American continent the same time as the Neolithic Era was in full swing... And had the same weapon technology, one of the things that defined that era. But if you actually spent time away from deviant p*rn sites long enough to look into this stuff, you'd know that.

      : )

      Delete
    57. Hey ikitomi

      A fellow worker confided in me his bleef in bigfoot today. I made him sweat over his confession for a while then I told him that I wouldn't tell anybody. He got all worried about that

      He said that a friend of his lives about 20 miles from east jordan michigan deep off the road. No power back in there and no neighbors for a ways. He said that his friend said that at night it sounds like a zoo and in early fall he hears very loud screams and howls in the middle of the night. He says that they don't go out at night just because

      He wouldn't give me no names so I gave him contact info for the BFRO and that they would want to know about it

      Thought you'd like to hear about this


      MMC

      Delete
    58. Amazing man... He's gotta record some of that stuff somehow. If you can get him to do that, that'll so f'n interesting. You never know man... You might have started a chain of events that lands the BFRO the best audio since the Sierra Sounds.

      Delete
    59. Mind you, this is some of the best stuff I've heard;

      https://youtu.be/d2XMTuNkyo4

      Delete
    60. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    61. Okay, one more time, Neolithic refers to the AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION!!!!! (emphasis added)

      Delete
    62. I know that "MUH BROTHA FRUM A NUTHA MUTHA" is , , , is ,, ,is , uh , AWE DAMN ,never mind !!

      MM 2 DA C YO ! ! Word! Church! Pump! An A Yo!

      Delete
    63. 14,000 years? Didn't you used to spout off some "Turtle Island" nonsense about humans being in North America for 50,000 years?

      Delete
    64. I guess it's pretty sad that I remember your idiotic ideas better than you do yourself. Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    65. ... Utterly irrelevant to my fundamental point; it's a period of time that still saw the American continent inhabited, and still a period of time innumerable people around the world without PhD's loosely apply to America. And yes, a lot of Native Americans claim to have lived on "Turtle Island" for 50,000 years.

      Now go shave ya palms you dirty racist pervert... I'll be back tomorrow to respond to any drivel left here.

      Delete
    66. regarding Neolithic...ikdummy NEVER admits his errors. NEVER.

      ikdummy regurgitates talking points. he has no scientific background. he's not that bright to start off with, has mental issues, and has no post high school education. And you can be very successful being self-educated but ikdummy has an average to low IQ combined with the mental confusion associated with whatever mental illness or issues he has.

      ikdummy is tailor-made to be pitied but his arrogance opens him up to ridicule.

      Delete
    67. Sort of like calling someone a "dirty racist pervert"?

      Delete
    68. If you didn't notice, I already took your point (s) apart. Learn something about the informal fallacies you take from cleverer people.

      Night Stue!

      Delete
    69. Okay Joerg, I'll be sure to remind you of your own previously stated bird brained opinions so you can avoid contradicting yourself again! Good night! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    70. And by the way, 2:52 was only attempting to explain why an insecure boob would concoct an hilariously tortured rationale for his misuse of the term "Neolithic" rather than simply admitting that he was wrong. That's not an ad hominem attack.

      =~)

      Delete
    71. ikdummy luxuriates in being ridiculed. ikdummy is ready for her close-up as she descends her grand staircase towards Mr. DeMille.

      Delete
    72. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    73. But there is no contradiction, Stue. I acknowledge the Native Americans' assertion & I am extremely open to it. But by abiding by what modern anthropologists insist upon (essentially giving you a little head start), that they have been living on the continent only 14,000 years; STILL falls within the time frame that which can be compared to the Neolithic, that is generally applied to European people at that time. Anyway... The Neolithic Era, or New Stone Age, was a period in the development of human technology, beginning about 10,200 BC in Europe, some parts of the Middle East, and later in other parts of the world and ending between 4500 and 2000 BC. Now even by mainstream anthropology & archeological understanding... "Mesoamerica" (a similar set of events i.e., crop domestication and sedentary lifestyles) possibly developed as early as 11,000–10,000 BC. The "Formative stage" is equivalent to the Neolithic Revolution period in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Even though it's not accurate to a PhD, I'm in very good company applying the terminology of the "Neolithic" to America. Just look for yourself on the internet Stuey. There were people thriving on the American continent and using the same human technology, which along with the collision of a comet, had a massive impact on the megafauna of the time (13-14,000 years ago), essentially wiping them all out. I wonder how many PhD's would have issue with you spending all your days trying to ridicule people about the idea of extant hominins, when you don't even know what "homo" means?

      You have this need to desperately find an angle, ANY angle to save face, that you never notice that the fundamental points you should to be addressing have already passed you by. It's like dwelling on the paranormal when the creature that's been laughed at for allegedly being paranormal, has already been shown to exist in the physical evidence it leaves. It's not very clever. I'm guessing you're not a very good chess player? It's funny as hell to read you calling me "uneducated" with a "low IQ" when the challenge you offer in debating is akin to the smallest weakling going around picking fights... It's simply a cruel streak on the part of anyone engaging you.

      Delete
    74. ... And let's not pretend you knew anything of the fact that the Neolithic isn't meant to be applied to America. If you knew that, then you would have known of terminology like "Mesoamerica", and then you might be intellectually warranted in using it now when you're getting smoked like a kipper. I can't even state that you're no different to me in respect of this... As I at least know a little of what I'm talking about.

      What a f'n patoot.

      : p

      Delete
    75. ^ Such a googling know nothing
      You make Us all laugh our ass'es off!
      Haaa Haaa Haaa lol!

      AC Collins

      Delete
    76. give it up, ikdummy. you fall flatter and flatter the more you strain.

      very, very sad and its becoming clearer that you have issues that are worsening.

      Delete
    77. Yes... Now proceed to invest all your emotions in anything up to another 100 comments over every comment section for the past few days, about how horrible me and MMC are.

      : )

      Like I said... Schooled.

      Delete
    78. I like how you plagiarized Wiki again in "your" explanation of Neolithic.

      Just can't help yourself, can you?

      Delete
    79. I'm just a dirty immoral plagiariser... What you gonna do about?

      Delete
    80. ikdummy, when you take a wrong turn, no matter how hard you argue, correct petty grammar, or cut and paste, you still have to right your course at some point. The lane your on isn't getting you anywhere, if you haven't noticed.

      Delete
    81. Anal anus anal I'm dirty and immoral anus anal anal Meldrum anus PhD anal anal schooled anus anal anal

      Delete
    82. Take a look at this entire comment section, Stuey... Only one of us is waiting on a counter argument. You don't upset me with this projection junk, Stue.

      Chop, chop old boy. I'm bored.

      Delete
    83. anal Chop anus Chop anal anal anal anus bored anal respond to anal anus anal anal must be bored anal anus anal need attention anus anal anal desperate anus anal must argue anal anus anal Meldrum anus anal

      Delete
    84. ikdummy thinks talking about Neolithic Periods and debating grammar will support this:



      The insane idea that not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.

      LOL

      Delete
    85. You might only now be sobering up Stue, but nobody else brought up the Neolithic.

      Plenty of missing hunters though, Stuey! And as long as there's repeatable scientific evidence for "10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apemen", then out of all those missing hunters, a good percentage may have been the result of mom and pops Bigfoot coming along to see what the commotion is.

      Delete
    86. ... And last time I checked, the technology to land on Mars wasn't readily available for commercial use just yet.

      Delete
    87. Anal anus May Have anal anal anus not bear anal anus or anal may have been bear anus anal anal anal may have anal anus not proof anus anal anal lost debate anus anal anal anus :( anal (*)

      Delete
    88. Don't worry about rushing to respond with anything, Stue. Take your time. Think of something that an adult would say... In the meantime I thought this was you all over;

      Signs of manipulative psychopatic personality at public forums:
      1) Name calling and labelling the others aggressively with no reason given
      2) Accusing the other posters from nonexisting or even psychopat's own activity
      3) Using of the plural pronouns like "we", "our" ("pluralis majestatis") when presenting private and subjective opinions
      4) Labelling the various concepts as a "true", "real", "actual" - although no such intersubjectively accepted definition exists
      5) Mass downvoting of other posters, often with using sockpuppet accounts
      6) Subscribing each post with poster's name, although its author is obvious already..
      7) Mindless spamming with copy&paste and repetitive posts
      https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-psychopathy-misunderstood-personality-disorder.html

      ... I found point 3 particularly interesting in your case.

      Delete
    89. My post regarding ikdummy's beliefs:

      The insane idea that not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.


      ikdummy's actual response:

      "Plenty of missing hunters though, Stuey! And as long as there's repeatable scientific evidence for "10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apemen", then out of all those missing hunters, a good percentage may have been the result of mom and pops Bigfoot coming along to see what the commotion is."



      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    90. Another ikdummy post:

      "... And last time I checked, the technology to land on Mars wasn't readily available for commercial use just yet."


      Who said anything about commercial use? I said we have the technology to land on Mars. Surely you must have heard of the Mars Rover? How did that get on Mars, you idiot?


      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHHA!!!!!!

      Delete
    91. Yes... People can read, Stuey. Pro tip as to where your focus should be; "and as long as there's repeatable scientific evidence for 10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apemen..."

      I'll refer you to the second half of my comment at 12:33, dear boy.

      Delete
    92. Besause the majority of hunters, Forest Service personnel & even professionals like biologists (the people most likely to spend the most time in the wildnerness of the US), don't have access to tech like the Mars Rover, Stue. Maybe when there's a consorted effort to track the creature in question, maybe then that tech'll come into play.

      Pro tip 2... When you need to publish so many "ha ha ha ha's", it's usually indicative of needing others to believe you're laughing when the opposite is most likely true.

      Delete
    93. "Plenty of missing hunters though, Stuey! And as long as there's repeatable scientific evidence for "10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apemen", then out of all those missing hunters, a good percentage may have been the result of mom and pops Bigfoot coming along to see what the commotion is."

      ~ikdummy


      They have never captured a 10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apeman, much less repeatably. No one cares about dimwits with fake plaster casts and psychotic hillbilly sightings, you idiot.

      HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!


      Delete
    94. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete





    95. ikdummy quote:

      "the people most likely to spend the most time in the wildnerness of the US), don't have access to tech like the Mars Rover"


      You dimwit, no one but an idiot like u would think i meant Mars landing technology should be applied to finding bigfoot.

      You are just caught up in a cycle of dumb.

      HHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!






      Delete
    96. If there's solid evidence that 10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apeman are running around the US, a country dotted with hunters, then its only natural some should be plucked by a couple of temperamental hominins who are cheesed off for having rifles shot at them. If the idea upsets you that much, you should be addressing the evidence, dear boy. From earlier in this comment section...

      "You have this need to desperately find an angle, ANY angle to save face, that you never notice that the fundamental points you should to be addressing have already passed you by. It's like dwelling on the paranormal when the creature that's been laughed at for allegedly being paranormal, has already been shown to exist in the physical evidence it leaves. It's not very clever. I'm guessing you're not a very good chess player?"

      Grow a pair Stuey, before you miss the boat again boio.

      Delete
    97. Stuart... Those increasing space bar hits appear to be an indicator of your increasing agitation.

      Delete




    98. spacing separates my brilliance from your confusion, ikdummy


      ikdummy endorses the insane idea that not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.

      You can twist and turn, ikdummy, but you can not defend your beliefs. You have not refuted that you believe the above statement to be true.


      HHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!





      Delete
    99. It's pretty simple... For these hominins to have evaded as well as they have done, they must have done so in social groups. Many of them may well have been shot & killed by hunters, but those hunters wouldn't get too far afterwards. I don't need to refute the above statement Stuey, because there is repeatable physical evidence for what I'm endorsing.

      Hey Stuart, a question... What equivalent to Mars landing level tech do you think should be applied to bagging a Bigfoot, at this point where mainstream scientists are reluctant to even look at the current state of evidence?

      Delete





    100. more fantasy speculation followed by literally thinking that technology equivalent to Mars landing technology is needed to capture an apeman. ikky ikky dum dumm






      Delete
    101. Stuey... You set the bar at Mars landing level tech, you should be accountable for your comments. That's a hefty budget, and one that would guarantee results no doubt. tell your world audience what it would take at this stage to bag a 10 foot, 800lbs naked hairy man.

      ... And the evidence requires no speculation, dear boy.

      Delete



    102. ikky dumm loves to argue.... if i say a country has 100 trillion dollars so it should be able to afford stop signs, that does not mean i believe it costs 100 trillion dollars to pay for stop signs.


      OR


      are you really THAT dumb?


      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!




      Delete
    103. Please tell me you have some sort of idea of how "ridiculously easy" it should be, to bag a Bigfoot with all this space age tech you reference? I mean... You're the one "laughing" at me, after all... I'm guessing you have an example at least, right?

      Delete



    104. For these hominins to have evaded as well as they have done.....Speculation, there is no definitive proof they exist.

      they must have done so in social groups.....Speculation


      Many of them may well have been shot & killed by hunters.......Sppeculation


      but those hunters wouldn't get too far afterwards.........Speculation


      too easy

      Delete
    105. PhD's are now happy to publish papers presenting the exact same foot morphology from two footprint casts found in North America, with that of one sourced in China, essentially providing irrefutable proof that the track impressions are of the same biped... There is nothing to speculate there.

      All primates are highly social... Kids level stuff.

      With the amount of crazy people who are happy to kill beautiful animals in the US, it's pretty obvious that some percentage of those people wouldn't think twice, given the millions it would mean to bag one... Obvious stuff.

      If you had more than one "10 foot tall, 800lbs naked apeman" after your backside, you wouldn't get her far... Obvious stuff.

      Delete
    106. ... When you already have the hominin in question leaving irrefutable sign, then all speculation as to their behaviour around hunters falls into place with a certain degree of common sense. We also have innumerable accounts of these hominins stalking & bluff charging hunters in pairs or groups whilst in the wilderness.

      Delete



    107. The insane idea that not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.

      ikdummy:
      "Obvious stuff. Kids level stuff. There is nothing to speculate there."


      Oh, how silly of me. LOL





      Delete
    108. You're not addressing the points, Stuey... I'll help;

      • Hominins exist in the US; factual based on the evidence.

      • Hominins are aggressive towards hunters; factual based on the reports that are subsequently supported by physical evidence of said hominin.

      • Missing hunters in the US; factual based on the evidence.

      All stem from the fact that there is physical evidence for said hominins. If there was none of that, then maybe you'd be sitting a little prettier. Is there something wrong that you should kee pathologically ignoring the evidence?

      : )

      Delete





    109. Not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.


      ikdummy: "Missing hunters in the US; factual based on the evidence."

      Yes, ikdummy there are missing people in the US. None are missing because a "Bigfoot" stole them, you idiot.


      Even Rictor put out a new video that says P/G was fake and alludes that his friend Gimlin may have been in on it.


      This has been over for a years. Its still fun ridiculing the clingers.




      Delete
    110. "Yes, ikdummy there are missing people in the US. None are missing because a "Bigfoot" stole them, you idiot."

      ... And based on what? Your inability to demonstrate that the many behavioural report and subsequent physical evidence for such hominins doesn't exist? Is that how logic works in that mind of yours, Stue? You need to at least substantiate one of your claims to expect something to stick against a proponent who's sitting on actual data. This is how adult level debate works, Stue.

      Like I said at 11:56 Stue, the idea that Bigfoot might take hunters not only has thousands of years of cultural anecdotes, but stems from the fact that there is actual physical evidence for said hominins, and innumerable reports of hunters being chased out of hunting areas. Not even one example of this space age tech, and you're meant to be ridiculing people, Stuey?

      Oh dear...

      Delete




    111. How do i back up my opinion that people have not been abducted by aliens or bigfoot or ghosts?

      Gee, ummm....



      Not 1 of 10,000 10 foot tall, 800 lb hairy naked apemen has ever been captured by 300,000,000 US inhabitants with the technology to land on Mars.

      ^ crazy, huh?



      Delete
    112. Because there is no physical evidence for aliens or ghosts, Stuey... And certainly not PhD's publishing papers in journals about it.

      So just to clarify... You expect anyone who is convinced on the existence of "Bigfoot", to reject the idea that hunters could be taken... Based on your inability to demonstrate that the many behavioural reports and subsequent physical evidence for such hominins doesn't exist?

      "The lane your on isn't getting you anywhere, if you haven't noticed."

      Delete
    113. This Iktomi guy is very insecure and DUMB!

      Delete
    114. yes, 12:50, but that doesn't mean he doesn't wet his bed and cling to imaginary hairy men.

      Delete
    115. Hey Stuey, stop talking to yourself a second and let's try this then... Can you name one organised, consorted effort from any known government group to harvest a "Bigfoot"?

      Delete
    116. Precisely!! How do you know that one couldn't be bagged with all your space age tech, if such an expedition hasn't occurred? That's unless you're gonna tell me one HAS occurred under the radar?

      So...

      In the meantime, the matter of bagging a hominin is down to the average hunter who on a collective level, come in contact with these hominins a lot and report how aggressive hey can be, how they refuse to shoot something so human looking, or how they do open fire and they move too quickly. And we have a lot of missing hunters. Hopefully this time I've helped you see how futile your drivel is... Now maybe we can get down to what would really substantiate your stance, the actual evidence?

      Delete
    117. Actually Stue... Save that embarrassment for the next time we talk. I think you've had enough.

      Laters darling!

      Delete
    118. @12:54 Not to mention that he's Suckin his thumb as he SWOONS in the bosom of his security
      haa haa haa lol

      HAA HAA HAA LOL

      Delete
  3. Proof read Anus anal anal twit anus anal ha ha ha ha ha schooled anal anal anus ha ha ha anal Bigfoot anus anus anal A N A L spelling anal anus anal

    ReplyDelete
  4. "They have never captured a 10 foot tall, 800lb hairy naked apeman, much less repeatably"
    I agree 100%! There would have been leaked pics by now, just like all the other stuff eventually gets leaked, and we've never seen anything, not even a fake ( unless you count Dyer!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr Squat captures crayola bigfoots all of the time. He is the master of two dimentinal self created bigfoot art that he deems undeniable evidence. You draw it in and suddenly it is real. Wow

      Delete
    2. 11:50 is ikdummy in anon mode

      Delete
    3. Kekky (11:50) Let me give you a little education. You can't see these creatures with the naked eye, unless you get extremely lucky. You have no evidence, and don't field research, if you did, you would realize this. The 2 dots i put for eyes are a courtesy to those who don't research, or they would never see them. It takes years to train your eyes to see their camouflage. Once again, why haven't you went out in 5 minutes like me, and produced the same evidence?
      Because you don't research, plain & simple!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story