Footage of the Rare Ontario Dogman


From Blayne Tyler on youtube:

Follow up to a previously posted important daytime winter footage of what was considered a Bigfoot Sasquatch sitting in a field N/E Ont. However the large dark haired subject has a distinct grey snout approx. 6-8" long. By definition of crypto classes this changes the class of this biped to rare footage of an Ontario Dogman, class B type 3. Footage was obtain following scary events at my house. They wouldn't leave us alone so I started looking for them in the woods & fields near our small town. Activity at house has sharply decreased after I located them and obtained this footage of what appears to be a female with juvies.

Comments

  1. This whole pareodolia thing has gone entirely too far. Everyone, left n right, posts up pix and videos of bushes and trees and proclaim them to be bigfoot or dogman. All you can ever see is a shadow and some bushes. Jeez....what a waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah i agree most of them could be something or nothing and they're not worth showing xx

      Delete
    2. You cannot disprove that they are Bigfoot...schooled

      Delete
    3. Are naturally fallen branches and trees that happen to form a vague pattern any better?

      Delete
    4. Got monkey suit?

      Naaaarg? (Crease) Aaaarg.

      Delete
    5. What’s the matter Stuey, you looking for a literary smack in the mouth? Are you sad your little parody Bruce Kiray didn’t suck anyone in?

      Though I endorse the importance of going through images with a fine-tooth comb (check out “there are at least 7 gorillas hiding in these plants”, link below)... There’s way too much pareidolia these days.

      Delete
    6. http://www.gorilladoctors.org/gorilla-doctors-attempt-to-rescue-a-baby-with-a-snare-around-its-neck/

      Delete
    7. Ooooh, monitor this lady is threatening violence ^

      Delete
    8. Searchingforbigfoot.com $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

      Delete
    9. Ooooh a literary smack in the mouth for Lucy

      Delete
    10. none of you research so you don't know anything about spotting them in the wild.
      My evidence will always be the best out there and people like Ikdummy are jealous because they can't even get one photo .
      if you don't believe me check this out- bigfoot getting kissed by dogman and smiling !
      Holy awesome sauce !
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-GlDFRCNhU

      MUST SEE EXTREME KABOOM !

      Delete
    11. Keep up the good work, Blayne Taylor.

      Delete
    12. ikdummy turned on dr. Squatch and then pareodolia. What's next, an anti-plaster ikdummy?

      Delete
    13. Carmine Thomas Biscardi (born 1948) is a cryptozoology enthusiast, Las Vegas promoter, internet radio host, and film producer. He describes himself as the "Real Bigfoot Hunter". Biscardi has been centrally involved in several hoaxes regarding Bigfoot that have garnered widespread international media attention (Wikipedia).

      Delete
    14. Biscardi rules! Perhaps the best bigfoot researcher ever.

      Delete
    15. 10 billion from Bigfoot, impressive, makes Gimlin look weak

      Delete
    16. A lot of people say Gimlin is a hoaxer, theres even a suit made that looks like Patty, is Bigfoot just a money making hoax, I believe so

      Delete
    17. So curious, how do you explain the thousands of years of encounters the native americans have had with the creatures ? Is Gimlin 10,000 years old and he's been running around with a monkey suit and planting footprints for those thousand years or is he just carrying on the tradition from his ancestors ?
      Bollocks !

      Joe

      Delete
    18. I’ll let Steven Str***fert answer for me:

      “I agree that the modern use of Native cultural elements is appropriation, and is not a really deep consideration of the uniqueness of the real Native cultures as they were or as they currently are.”

      “I don't think that a giant ogress, or a spirit being, or a shapeshifting entity that can take any form, or a myth of The Guardian of the Woods, or of wild tribes of humans who interacted with other tribes, can be bent and molded into the modern ‘Bigfoot.’If anything, they contradict the modern image.”

      http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=312102&page=4

      Delete
    19. Fake Curious... You don’t have one example of magic monkey suit. Your 8 year effort at trying to substantiate your “Bigfoot Millionaires” theory rests on someone who’s a PROVEN hoaxer & Las Vegas promoter.

      (Slow claps)

      Stick to your hoaxing conspiracy theories. They’re far safer for your psychological issues.

      Delete
    20. Stuey... you didn’t have an answer for anthropological studies on native oral histories a couple of days ago... what makes think I’m going to forget about that the second time around?

      Judging by how you’re frantically publishing comments... you’re clearly pretty p****d about something bro.

      Delete
    21. Searchingforbigfoot.com $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

      Delete
    22. Bigfoot billionaire, I believe you stand corrected and as usual are proven wrong, slap

      Delete
    23. Ok... Since you’re too stupid to realise, plus I’m not doing anything for five minutes, here’s how your drivel can’t apply...

      • You have never shown that any researchers with any integrity are hoaxers.
      • You have never shown that any one of the same researchers are able to give up their day jobs, for the funds they accumulate for further research.
      • You have not provided any substance to what Biscardi allegedly earns.
      • And even if you did, he’s a Las Vegas promoter and one might assume he’s not doing too bad for money.
      • And even if he DOES earn well from “Bigfoot”... he’s a proven hoaxer, thus cannot be applied as a comparison to other researchers you’re trying to claim are frauds.

      Delete
    24. Strawman^

      Profit from bigfoot, not become millionaire, you idiot. Meldrum etc pad their incomes and it helps them financially, a lot.

      Delete
    25. I think you need to look up the meaning of “strawman”.

      If people like Meldrum aren’t hoaxing, then the funds they raise are for furthering research. Money for that isn’t coming from anywhere else. You need to show that Meldrum is a hoaxer. You didn’t even know John Bindernagel was Canadian, let’s not pretend like you know Meldrum’s financial situation, Stuey.

      Delete
    26. Keep raising the bar when its cleared, theres a Bigfoot billionaire do you deny it? Sorry but you asked and received, who cares if you like it, and Gimlin only millionaire:(, $$$$$$$, oh boo hoo Lucy only wants what she considers "legit" Bigfoot people because her feelings are hurt

      Delete
    27. You need to show Meldrum is a hoaxer
      Lucy
      Todd Standing, ha ha ha

      Delete
    28. No Stuey... you’d need to be able to reach the bar before it’s raised. Just like you asserted Gimlin was a millionaire without so much as one reference or evidence that he’s a hoaxer, you now expect people to believe a known Las Vegas promoter and hoaxer is a billionaire? I’m well aware I’m being trolled. But Stuey... if you want to fulfill your life’s aspiration of agitating people 24/7, please at least have some substance instead of the most asinine claims.

      And even if Todd Standing is a hoaxer, that would mean Meldrum is being hoaxed. And not perpetuating a hoax.

      (**** me it’s like b-slapping a very small, rather drunk man)

      Delete
    29. Lucy you asked who makes money off Bigfoot, your strawgirl arguments won't work here

      Delete
    30. Look up searchingforbigfoot.com a publicly traded company, look it up Lucy, you go girl, have a nice cry

      Delete
    31. Is appearing in a movie with aa hoaxer of Bigfoot about Bigfoot with your name in the credits perpetuating a hoax, duh yes it is Lucy. I hope Meldrum isn't with Todd when he robs a bank

      Delete
    32. Jesus Lucy, I can't stand slapping you around like this, I'm going swimming, you come up with a nice seething reply about how wrong everyone else is, or better yet attack DS like you do when the truth overwhelms you

      Delete
    33. Oh no, I’d better get a box of tissues.

      Actually, after 8 years of you claiming that Bigfoot researchers are frauds who chase the dollar signs... I’ve only ever required you provide substance. And for 8 years, you’ve provided Tom Biscardi. Someone who not one person in the field thinks has any integrity, and who is a confirmed multiple-time hoaxer.

      Now try the same with Meldrum, and your comparison applies.

      Bigfoot is free to put in your product. Any clown can put it on a t-shirt or a cap and sell it. It’s the same as any other animal on the planet. It’s the same as a flying saucer... you have millions of people with wardrobes full of clothing products with the aforementioned subjects on them. None of it is to the detriment of those subjects... and Bigfoot t-shirts, mugs and caps sold my Las Vegas promoters are not to the detriment of scientists who tour seminars for the books they write and discuss research that’s being published in journals.

      Delete
    34. Yeah girl you believe that, good thing you got those tissues

      Delete
    35. Oh and Stuey... whilst with Todd, Meldrum found physical evidence in tracks to support his own sighting, in a research area that loads of researchers attacked Todd for allegedly stealing a genuine research area.

      Now I’d better go and cry... (sob, sob, sob).

      Delete
    36. Searchingforbigfoot.com $$$$$$$$ dream makers and dream breakers for big girls like Lucy, maybe Meldrum can win the million dollar prize, catch up with Gimlin hahaha

      Delete
    37. Did he make plaster casts in the muskeg? Nope laters girl, you are losing bad today , get yourself a nice tampon

      Delete
    38. Oh, so suddenly “plaster” is of some worth to you? Can we bunch this contradiction in with “blurry PGF” and “imaginary clear zippers”?

      Delete
    39. No plaster or dermal ridges as proof of Bigfoot ? Or Todd foot? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    40. Sorry Stuey... was that meant to be a coherent sentence?

      Delete
    41. Stuey has been very busy today with his spicy salami digits pounding away on his keyboard. such a trooper !

      Joe

      Delete
    42. Oh you girl, attack with your sister self

      Delete
    43. I thought you were meant to be swimming Stuey?

      Delete
    44. Yes, swimming in the blood of you and your lame sock puppets! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    45. You idiot, ikdummy. Yes, if all anons are the same, I said Gimlin is a millionaire. Otherwise, I have no idea how much he actually made from bigfoot.

      ikdummy, you're a moron that communicates with several different people but emotionally needs to believe that you've been talking to one person. My last post was 12:11, and you'd better look up strawman argument, fool.

      Delete
    46. Stuey, you are the only person on the face of this planet, who claims Bob Gimlim is a millionaire. Nobody else on the planet has ever even heard of this before. Just like Biscardi is now apparently a billionaire. You’re delusional... utterly crazy. And then when you come to your senses like you just have done, your asinine claims are still yours Stuey. And still, you are too stupid to get it... You need to prove that such people are being fraudulent. You do that by debunking what they hold as evidence.

      There is one troll. There has only ever been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll. I guess “swimming” actually meant taking some time out as you were so angry. Fitting that now you’ve cooled down that you want to distance yourself from such embarrassing drivel up top. That’s what a bit of logical thinking & old fashioned common sense does for you. That’s why I’m here for you Stuey.

      I’ll be back in the morning.

      Delete
    47. Thanks for letting me know your schedule so I can plan on being here to inflict your next daily beat down!

      Delete
    48. No Google in Wales or just a willfully ignorant girl

      Delete
    49. I actually did go swimming while you were seething and fighting with other people you delusional big girl, so people make money off Bigfoot, dont hate them just because it doesn't fit your narrative, you really are wrong about everything Lucy ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    50. ^he went swimming in the sewer. Choked on a turd^

      Delete
    51. I thought Iktomi left, clever girl ^

      Delete
    52. “People make money off Bigfoot”...

      • Are they perpetuating a dishonest pastime by peddling a myth, gaining from dishonesty and therefore being fraudulent by hoaxing millions of people and academics.

      • Or, are they partaking in furthering a field of biological research where funds to take them away from their day jobs are not forthcoming, educating as many people as possible, AND who have contributed to evolving a subject of study that has the attention of millions of people, as well as an academic consensus.

      ... Stuey, you have never, ever substantiated the former. You have only ever provided a Las Vegas promoter and already well known hoaxer (side tracking your burden), and a hoaxing conspiracy theory because of a sheer lack of control over a subject you obsess about to help forget about your clinical depression.

      Hope that helps.

      Delete
    53. Myth peddlers, just like you. Not illegal, they're just hell bent on pushing their childhood fantasies. You think you're being cute trying to debate a myth into reality on a blog. You're a silly nobody. If this helps you in some way, fine, but bigfoot will never magically become real and the traffic here is very low.

      Delete
    54. “Myth peddlers, just like you. Not illegal, they're just hell bent on pushing their childhood fantasies.”
      ... OK, so how would an adult go about persuading someone ignorant of the subject, that the above statement is true? Especially since these people present evidence to warrant their efforts?

      My words have no influence on eyewitness reports rolling in, as well as track impressions turning up every year. My words have no influence on academics who have found this evidence credible enough to publish it in in a journal. Both these forms of evidence bring the reality of this hominin into perspective. My words do however provide references to this, and this appears to have a fascinating repercussion on the psychology of some who have a pathological need for these hominins to not exist. You’d simply expect even the most dense of those inflicted with such a psychological issues to provide one piece of substance for almost a decade of harassing people on the internet about it.

      Shall we now discuss the psychology of conspiracy theorists again Stuey? I enjoyed that.

      Delete
    55. You live in a fantasy world. Every anon is same person. Everyone has posted here for 8 years. Bigfoot is real. Then you try to turn around every thing anyone has said about crazy bigfoot myth chasers and apply the same language back, all the while posting in your confused 'word salad' jumble which is designed to annoy. You're a mess.

      Delete
    56. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/strange-cases-of-missing-people.html?m=0

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/bigfoot-truth-told.html

      Each link above is irrefutable proof that you’re the one troll with two writing styles, who has resorted to criminal behaviour, who has harassed this blog for many, many years. The the only fantasy here Stuey, is the antithesis to that which you desperately need to make it look like you have support. That actually is so sad it’s hard to articulate. That’s the only myth that one of us is clinging to. Why do you think that not one single regular poster believes you anymore, Stuey? You are addressed by everyone as “Stuey” whenever your comments surface, and even after you pointed out “the traffic here is very low”, you still expect people to believe that more than one psycho is going to assert the same drivel in the same thread of comments... even when these comments are full of “$$$$$$”, when allegedly you went “swimming” in that time?

      Stuey... there is one troll. There has only ever been one troll and there will only ever be one troll. I took away your little cloak & dagger, I took away your conspiracy theory, I took away your PGF myth that provided you with a cyber-identity... and I’ve taken away your little cyber playground.

      And I’m not going anywhere.

      Delete
    57. And tell me Stuey... what are you doing, what can you reference for 8 years of harassing people on the internet to make them believe in this “crazy bigfoot myth chasers” jig? Let me see you type it... come on Stuey, you know you’re dying to. Or do you have no confidence in your hoaxing conspiracy anymore?

      When it comes down to it Stuey, one of us has the scientific method and can point to peer review on track impressions made by the PGF subject. The other has sad conjecture and mere conspiracy theories. The irony here is that for years of making demands on enthusiasts, you’re now stuck in your own flip sided bubble of pseudoscience.

      You just can’t get a break.

      Delete
    58. Stuart broke after his menopausal wife left him. He has nothing else to do but twiddle and diddle himself here for 8 years. I heard she found a better man.

      Delete
    59. I can’t imagine it would have been difficult.

      Delete
    60. And this is the cracker of the day...

      AnonymousSaturday, February 17, 2018 at 1:09:00 PM PST
      Did he make plaster casts in the muskeg? Nope laters girl, you are losing bad today , get yourself a nice tampon

      ... After months at claiming “plaster” is meaningless (repeatedly demonstrating utter naivety with respect to field biology), he now requires the same process to validate a report by an anthropologist. He then has the audacity to claim someone else is in a mess.

      Delete
    61. Lucy can't stand being wrong ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    62. Lucy claims Meldrum confirmed Bigfoot with footprints while wth Todd with no proof those very same footprints weren't created by Todd, Lucy should pay Todd to take her out and show her "evidence " of Bigfoot ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    63. Now Lucy finally comes here and admits plaster casts of Bigfoot aren't proof of Bigfoot, silly girl ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    64. YOUR irefutable proof is a link. YOUR irrefutable proof is a paper. You convince yourself of what you need to believe. You MUST have only one blog adversary but 10000 hairy men hiding in the woods.

      You're not mentally ill. LOL

      Delete
    65. I repeat Stuey... one of us has the scientific method. The other has conspiracy theories, contradictions and conjecture.

      Thst must burn.

      Delete
    66. There's my JREF girl, everyone understood that especially you Lucy,why so angry when caught in your lies?

      Delete
    67. I’m sorry, I’m really struggling to understand you Stu. You been hitting the sauce again?

      Delete
    68. You are a drunk from Wales. You were decimated on blog by a real scientist named Andy White. I don't like you, but was in pain for you, because of how stupid you revealed yourself to be. You're too dumb to see it. You fall very short of being a scientist.

      Delete
    69. 7:55 is Joe talking to his iktomi persona.

      Delete
    70. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha living in denial Lucy? Go have a good cry

      Delete
    71. Aaaaargh Andy White again. Hey Stuey... You are of course very welcome to point out where I was decimated. Last time you attempted this you at least learned a little. I’ve never claimed to be a scientist Stuey, I’ve only ever claimed to know something about a subject before piping up about it.

      I also love making you flip your lid.

      Delete
    72. Yes, you really knew your subject when you repeated tried to bow out and save face when you were in over your head with Andy White. We get it. You're a Welsh lush trying to debate bigfoot into existence because you have no post high school education. 10000 10 foot tall hairy men hiding in the USA. Got it.

      Delete
    73. Stuey... so I take it you don’t have one example of me being in over my head in that instance?

      Stuey, there is no debate as far as you’re concerned. But providing references to the evidence that brings these hominins into reality might help educate someone somewhere on the subject. I need you for that, I need an idiot, and you just come back for more and more. That’s the penny that’s never dropped. And it most certainly appears to have a fascinating repercussion on the psychology of the likes of you who have a pathological need for these hominins to not exist.

      If I was so worried about what other people were convinced by, I’d try harder.

      Delete
    74. You're missing the point, ikdummy. People come here to ridicule the fool from Wales. They're not going to waste time creating a dossier on you and researching a fake monster.


      Hope this helps.

      Delete
    75. There are no “people”. There is just you Stuey... And you’ve had 8 years to ridicule me. Conspiracy theories, contradictions and conjecture never got round to doing that to anyone.

      Delete
    76. Stuey, Stewie, Stooey
      A tosser by any other name would still reek to high heaven
      Amazing that this is what occupies this young lads mind to the point where he gives a power point presentation to his imaginary friends every night before falling asleep when his big fat head hits the pillow
      oh such tragedy befalls this poor sod

      Joe

      Delete
    77. Bigfoot will continue to be a role-playing game for weasels like Joe F1tzgerald who are peddling their mythological monster.

      Joe F1tzgerald will continue to post on bigfoot role-play blogs for another 8 years, as will his sockpuppets.

      Delete
    78. But Stuey... what are you doing to convince someone that this is all a role-playing game? Mere words from someone who doesn’t have any credentials, or integrity for that matter, are just uneducated opinionated words to a stranger reading them. They don’t hurt, they don’t convince and they don’t make anything a reality. It’s proof, shifting the burden that comes with such claims that does everything that you seek in this world... to be this internet sceptic that’s stopping us, evil enthusiasts, spreading our “lies”. If you just want to achieve what your heroes over at the JREF want, and that’s to harass people like us from exchanging ideas... then that’s all you’ll ever be. Someone who harasses people.

      Try harder... you lazy sod.

      Delete
    79. ikdummy, no one will ever convince you that bigfoot doesn't exist, Why bother? It's more fun laughing at you.

      I could see if this was a prank for you, or entertainment, but you seem to really believe in bigoot. You are a total rat. A little rodent, pushing fake monster garbage.

      Delete
    80. You don’t come across like you’re laughing Stuey... in fact, you come across like you have a little vendetta for someone who took your little cyber-identity away.

      So tell me... Who else is pushing this “fake monster garbage”? Are the PhD’s endorsing the evidence a part of this evil role-playing conspiracy theory? How many world-wide? I’m fascinated to understand how this theory plays out in your mind.

      Delete
    81. Here’s a thought... If all researchers are hoaxers and role-players... wouldn’t you expect them to be making all sorts of wild reports of witnessing these creatures all the time?

      Now I came to that question within minutes of trying to put myself in the shoes of a hoaxing conspiracy nut like you. Don’t you ever self-reflect... Dumbo?

      Delete
    82. ikdummy is posting on a Dogman(fake) thread about Bigfoot(fake).

      "Mr. Science" LOL

      Delete
    83. Well done Stuey... Now tell me, where do these conspiracy theories fit in with your superior understanding of how science works?

      Delete
    84. (I just had to get the 100th comment)

      Delete
    85. Wow, who were you arguing with while I was away Lucy, that non existent monster sure gets you seething , don't you have a life?

      Delete
    86. (Cringe)

      Stuey... you’d make a psychologists famous.

      When I come back in the morning, I’m hoping to be able to read the justification for this hoaxing conspiracy theory. Try your hardest now Stuey, you don’t want people to think you’re losing confidence in your religion.

      Delete
    87. Oh thought you'd left, forgot you're a liar

      Delete
    88. Ah the religion of logic and reason is on my side backed by science, but you have stories and footprints , gasp, however can I continue Lucy?

      Delete
    89. 2:51 Why is ikdummy Lucy? Lucy as in Australopithicus or something else?

      Delete
    90. So you have a religion? Tell me... what’s logical about a thousands’ year old hoaxing conspiracy theory? What science is backing this theory. I can’t wait to read this version of science. What method of science can you apply to conspiracies?

      Like I said... I have peer reviewed science. I have the scientific method that’s been applied to physical evidence.

      Delete
    91. You never published your probability report that there could be 10,000 hairy 10 foot tall apemen hiding in US forests, Mr. "Non-conspiracy theory".

      HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Schooled.

      Delete
    92. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    93. How does a “probability report” make published physical evidence bunk? What’s the relevance of probability, and what example in field biology can you reference pre-classification where it’s mattered?

      Do you ever think before you press the “publish” button?

      Delete
    94. Thats not evidence you present it's garbage rejected by the scientific community, you know that as fact Lucy

      Delete
    95. Sorry Stuey... it’s been published. That means it has a scientific consensus. That doesn’t prevent it from being open to scientific scriticty of course, so you can crack on and find an academic equivalent. But this is how it stands at present... I have the scientific method, you have conjecture, conspiracy theories and a shed load of tantrums.

      Delete
    96. LOL ikdummy, there has been no published material on the probability that there are 10000 10 foot tall apemen hiding in US woods.

      Post a link, fool. You've got zero.

      Delete
    97. What’s the relevance of probability being published, and what example in field biology can you reference pre-classification where it’s mattered?

      I’ve got you behaving all erratic, look...

      ; )

      Delete
    98. Yes, ikdummy, you are erratic so you call me erratic.

      Bigfoot is psuedoscience, so you call science "pseudoscience". I'm waiting for you to call me welsh.

      Delete
    99. Stu, only one of us is harping on about utter irrelevances like their life depends on it.

      No... It’s your unqualified opinion that Bigfoot is pseudoscience, Stuey. If it were so, then PhD’s wouldn’t be endorsing it. Can you name one example where PhD’s have done the same for conspiracy theories?

      Delete
    100. Nope, you lack one shred of scientific evidence , too bad

      Delete
    101. ikdummy: "Only one of us is harping on about utter irrelevances like their life depends on it."

      Yeah, you. Bigfoot isn't real but this imaginary creature is on your mind 24/seven. And you invent another fantasy that all anon posters are the same person, another improbability, to make yourself feel like you have only one adversary. Then, you invent that all anons have been posting on this site for 8 years just like you, another improbability. Now, you are trying to undo the hurt by trying to turn around all things said about bigfooters, You're a mess.

      Delete
    102. Not accoring to the PhD’s on Meldrum’s work on hominid track impressions, Stuey.

      Stuey... “traffic here is slow”, your words, yet how many people do you expect to believe there’s more than one kook maintaining the same arguments that were destroyed hours ago?

      “Bigfoot isn't real but this imaginary creature is on your mind 24/seven”... Stuey, do you ever self-reflect. You do know narssism is a sure sign of he Dark Tedrad, right?

      Delete
    103. Sure, ikdummy, those who DON'T believe that there are 10000 furry men hiding in US forests are kooks.

      ikdummy has dropped probability....LOL

      Delete
    104. Plenty of people don’t believe in the existence of Bigfoot. 99.9% of them aren’t remotely aware of the evidence that supports the idea. The kooks are the ones that spend their days harassing people online about it, with even crazier theories. A “kook” abides by logical fallacies and conspiracies. That’s you.

      Delete
    105. A kook obsesses on material 99.9% dismiss as kooky, and it's not like you've proved us wrong after 50 years, and it's not like you ever will. You're a welsh nut, obsessed with ever so, just out of reach, almost tangible, American monster myths.

      Delete
    106. 99.9% find kooky? Oh Stuey, more fake stats? Just like these probability experts that have applied their field to Bigfoot? Not according to a long line of PhD’s Stuey. And that’s the boat your cognitive dissonance is blanking out. I did prove it. How many times have you required peer review and have lent on it as the benchmark for evidence and recognition? For 50 years of this subject being in pop-culture... the subject is now peer reviewed and has a scientific consensus. Myths never get proven with the scientific method to exist in the present.

      And just remember one thing Stuey. I’m here, a blog catered for the subject, looking to discuss that subject. You’re here, seven days a week insulting and trying to intimidate, trying to dominate comment sections, and that’s because you have a pathological NEED for these “American monster myths” to not exist. It’s your narcissism that means you can perversely point fingers at others for doing that, and that’s akin to psychologists calling people like you psychopaths. Do people usually have to stoop to any cruddy behaviour to prevent people from discussing a topic of such an alleged lack of substance? People who have confidence in their assertions can leave it go in satisfaction... It’s that simple. And you have no control over this subject Stuey. You have never substantiated one single argument on this blog... and everyone believes you to be every bit a laughing stock as you try and convince others people like me are.

      I shouldn’t say it, but it’s comforting knowing that the extent to which you like to troll and harras is merely indicative of a mirrored social and emotional turmoil. And again, unlike you, I can provide genuine expert references to that statement.

      10,000 hoaxers running around the woods of the US. Funny... As... ****.

      Delete
  2. Or maybe giant forest friends

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not much of anything to see here as usual on most of these videos, waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Searchingforbigfoot.com $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lucy is having to deal with her menopause, more dryed up than Bindernagle's bones ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^his wife divorced him when she hit menopause. she said you're an @ssh@le stu. And an old drunken b@stard.^

      Delete
  6. Iktomi, even you should be able to get a photo of a dogman. Like all dogs, dogmen love fire hydrants. Dress-up like a fire hydrant and sit out in the woods with a camera. When he goes to take a leak on you, snap his picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like you speak from experience, haints.

      Where's your picture? Camera get peed on too?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story